Quote:
|
What makes you so sure that it needs weeks of airstrike?
|
Well a starting point would be the ranges, capabilities and sustainabilities , especially regarding ranges, capabilities and sustainabilities with an added dose of repeatabilities.
From such simple stuff you could move on to little things like effectiveness, which would come back to ranges capabilities and sustrainabilities with some added complications of dispersal and redundacy with some added reinforcement.
Then to take it onwards you have the fallout which affects ranges capabilities and sustainabilities plus adds reprisals.
So really the question is what on earth makes you think that it is possibly even doable in the first place let alone sustainable or effective even without weeks or months of airstrikes?
Quote:
Just because the Iranian Loudmouth Ahmadinedschad and other self proclaimed "Middle east experts" say so and the international appeasement press is willingly following this logic?
No one of us knows what the Israelis already know about the locations and their positions and how they will take care of.
|
Wow, years of IAEA reports on just the known facilities seem to have escaped your equation
Have you even seen the Israeli test model for destroying just a single facility using its entire capabilty at maximum range with a full scale of "bloody lucky" on every single roll out of 40 dice and no repeatability at all??????.....when you find it you can perhaps tell us how many months they expect to put the Iranians back by if all works perfectly.