Quote:
Originally Posted by JU_88
So now Its a crime to illustrate a problem unless you can provide a solution?
Sorry I didnt realise that was the rule Steve.
|
Did I accuse you of a crime? Did I accuse you of anything? I asked you if you had a solution. I disagree with you, just as I disagree with a lot of people. Do you think because I disagree that I'm putting you down? For all I know you're right. I don't have any answers. I only argued against certain things you said, specific things, which I think are wrong.
On the other hand:
Quote:
|
Would you care to enlighten me as how you think capitalsim works then? Specifically how maximum profit is achieved?
|
Was that not you doing to Tater exactly what you accuse me of doing to you?
Quote:
I wasn't having a go at people who borrow money (but rather those who lend it), nor was I taking a pop at mobile network providers.
that was purley your own interpretation steve.
|
I never said you were. You came up with the examples, and I said that in my opinion they weren't valid. You then said I missed the point. What was the point, then?
Quote:
|
Actually I was trying to illustrate that Skybirds artical is maybe worth its salt, when everyone else is being so bloody dismissive of it.
|
Okay, so that was your point. That leads you to:
Quote:
|
But I guess so long as you all have running water and continue to live better than folks in 1920, everythings just peachy for you guys?
|
So, while saying I accused you of a crime, your actual arguing style is to dismiss our arguments with what, hiding our heads in the sand?
Quote:
|
Sorry for giving a rats-ass
|
And finally disagreeing with you leads to a mocking false apology? What did anyone say to you to make you want to reply like that? Tater disagrees with you. Is that a
crime? Neither he nor I accused you of anything, yet you accuse us of doing so. I will apologize for coming on strong, but dumping on people who disagree with you is a strange way of conducting an argument.