Quote:
Originally Posted by vienna
Questions not answered in the BBC story:
1. Does the bus service get any federal, state, or local funding or subsidies? If it does, then the practice is illegal and unconstitutional;
2. Does the bus line only serve a particular population, i.e., it does not pick up members of the public at large at regular bus stops but only provides service by subscription, for example. If it doesn't, then the practice is illegal and unconstitutional;
Religious or other factors do not apply as an exemption if the line is public and/or sudsidized by tax dollars or open to the general public...
|
It is a privately CONTRACTED bus by the city - which pays the contract from the public coffer - so it is recieving public funds, one way or the other.
As the bus is "public" - it would serve the public at large. As a public transportation vehicle, it would be illegal to refuse to pick up a member of the general public based on them not being part of a "specific population" group.
If this is happening - the bus contractor has stepped in the cowpie.