Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc
So even thou you believe in NIST explanation, you are also one of them who wants an independent investigation on 9/11 or did I misunderstood you?
|
I haven't read the NIST report completely, but what I've read, they do very
detailed work on explaining what they are out to explain.
As for the independent investigation, sure, it wouldn't hurt. Tho, I don't see
how it would change opinions. For some, being a "truther" is a business, so.
Quote:
Have I red the whole report from NIST? No!
Have I red everything from the opposite? No!
|
Frankly, I don't think that reading the whole NIST report is mandatory to get
a good idea of what happened. 911myths.com has pretty much everything
you need in nice "their claim, our take" style of explanation.
Quote:
|
I'm just one of those, who wants a fully and truly independent investigation on this 9/11. I my self can't make my mind up before we have had this investigation. Until then I stand (almost)neutral
|
Look around the internet, plenty of stuff available publicly to make up your own
mind about 9/11.
Quote:
There are some videos that i think is very interesting
Like this one
|
Personally, I don't see anything suspicious in the collapse of WTC7.
For one, it was badly damaged by the WTC 1 and 2 collapses, secondly it
burned for 6-7 hours more or less unchecked and lastly, WTC7's floors from the
7th up were supported by only 3 trusses, one of them collapsed and that made
the other 2 to collapse few seconds later (supported by video of the collapse).