[JU_88]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

Which would indicate that if it was a conspiracy then the conspirators were incredibly stupid, thinking no one would notice.

To be fair -most people didnt notice. they were still in too much of a shock from the towers coming down, and there was relitivley little media coverage of WTC7s collapes.
We are supposed to belive that office fires over a few floors caused the 47 story steel building to near symetrically collapes into its own foot print.
Im no engineer, so maybe its possible, but then again 1,627 architects and engineers say thats its not. http://www.ae911truth.org/

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

I can answer that quite easily. Either

1) They were in a hurry to cover up any possible evidence, which might work for the buildings but would make no sense for the aircraft, since it's obvious what happened to them (which is what truthers want you to believe, or

2) Since it was obvious what happened, why bother to examine the debris? An aircraft investigation is usually conducted to discover what happened and why. In this case both were presumed to be known. A mistake? Possibly. A cover-up? Not likely.

Its possible I suppose that it was overlooked, but it doesn't seem likely that organisations such as FEMA and NIST simply forgot to do their job properly.
We dont normally 'assume' why buildings collapes or why aircraft crash, we normally check to make sure, (Even when it seems obvious!)
If a 737 pilot reports a dual engine failure before a fatal crash, we still investigate, to se if he was correct.
Likewise if two 110 storey building fall to the gound after plane impacts and fires, we still need know exactly how it happened from a scientific point of view.
If nothing else it could help us build safer highrise buildings in the future.
Ground Zero was both a disaster Zone and a crime scene, but for what ever reason it was only treated as the former.

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

And I have to ask: What debris? What exactly remained of an aluminum aircraft that flew headlong into a steel building? There may not have been anything left to examine.

Well we have managed to examined aircraft that have flown headlong in to the ground, or at least recover the flight data recorders.
you dont need me to tell you that the ground is denser than a steel and glass building. But who knows...

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

You might want to take a look at this analysis of the pentagon evidence:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...ns/debris.html

And these pictures of the wreckage from inside the pentagon, especially the wheel photos:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...ns/debris.html

And a better analysis of the same story:
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html

[/QUOTE]

Thank for the links, i will see if they have anything I may have missed.
I am skeptical about the pentegon, but im not convinced either way. I would like to see them release some of the CCTV footage they collected that clearly shows a 757 hit the building.
I will not believe that such footage doesnt exist, we are talking about the Pentagon
That would remove all doubt in my mind.

Anyway, there is too much speculation, most people who conduct armchair investigations into 9/11 are either Conspiricy theroists or Conspiricy Debunkers who have already made up there mind on what happened and just choose the bits that support what they belive.