Quote:
Originally Posted by JU_88
Been there done that. That site is already in my favorites, its mostly hearsay mate 
We shouldnt need sites like this anyway - if they had carried out a proper investigation and not destroyed and with held most of the evidance.
"Shall we foresically examine the rubble of the worst terrorist attack on US soil? - nah i dont think we'll bother, lets just assume that fire softened the trusses".
For real?
No wonder the 9/11 'truth' movement is growing, nothing wrong with asking for the truth mind, but there is pleanty wrong with saying 'it was an inside job' that is just theory and assumption......
trust me I ve spent days reading up on 9/11 and my conclusion is - its inconclusive, I dont think we will ever really know -or be 100% sure of what happened on that terrible day. |
As you wish. For me 99.9% is good enough. That last .1% requires having participated in the event itself.