[Skybird]

On the Gaza raid I again ppoint out that Israel had a legal obligation by international law to not allow running the blockde. It is undisputed and recognioed even by the UN that the sea blockade is legal. International law now rules that the side declaring a naval blockade in accordance with international law must make sure that not a single exception is allowed, not a single shoip is allowed to pass thorugh. Else - ther whole legality of the blockade would immediately be cancelled and the blockade by international law would be declared as void. To stop the convoxc before it even enbtered the bloackde zone, also is perfectly legal by international law.

The commandos boarding that Turkish provocateur also acted in self defence while their very lives were threatened by an armed mob attacking them.

There have been so many incidents of Hamas or Hezbollah arranging scnes for pohotopgraphers to manipulate global sentiments, that I do not count them anymore. Also mind you that both set up their militzary ifrastrucxture inentionally within civilian infrastrucxture with the intention to maximise civilian losses in case Israel fires at these ammo dumps in school basements and commando post in Kindergartens and sniper strongholds on hosptial roofs. Hamas and Hezollah not only accept to have theior own people killed - they even arrange the killing of civilians, push up the numbers, and have been shown to actively hide within civilian groups to gain either immunity when firing, or to score in the propaganda war when Israel fires at them and kills the target along with a civilians. Also, during the Lebanon war it became known that by weapon's force they hindered villagers to leave villages, but to stay inside of them when an Israeli air attack was about to be conducted on the village in question, they hoped to create civilian casualties that way that they could sell as evidence for Israeli war crimes to the media.

The one sides provokes civilian deaths on its own side, it hides behind civilians and fires from hiding behind a civilian'S body. The other side aims and fires at fighters, warns of attacks early, so that civilians could leave the house in time (anbd the target as well, btw), and while aiming at military targets cannot avoid collateral damages. The first get called "freedom fighters" while in fact they terrorise their own population and hoipe they get killed so that they can make new pictures. The second gets called "war criminals". How absurd!