Imo, 'creationism' is (like all religious beliefs) tantermount to superstition.
Sadly, religion exists to 'fill the gaps' left by science and unfortunately whilst science keeps evolving, religion is firmly entrenched in the past (like those dinosaurs the happy-clappers maintain were made by god as fossils to be 'discovered' by man- "all part of God's rich tapestry" yeh,
riiight)
I'm afraid that trying to mix science and creationism into some sort of amalgam just doesn't cut it for me.
Sure, religion had its uses; back when the state and the church were more or less the same thing it was good for keeping the unruly (but largely god-fearing) unwashed masses under control, a guide to tell uneduacted ppl how to behave and how to get along with eachother and be nice, if you will.
These days however, saying creationism is the real deal is like trying to prove that the world is flat- most sensible people will laugh at you, and quite rightly so.
I'm not denying the existance of something we as a species don't know about or understand ie. how the universe came to be etc. But I don't see this lack of knowlege as any kind of reason to declare that it must be because of 'GOD' or semolina or whatever, just because we don't yet know the whole truth. And if you look at it like that 'God' is just a euphamism for ignorance. :hmm: