View Single Post
Old 09-30-11, 10:02 AM   #9
joegrundman
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,689
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie View Post
President Mookie: "Oh no, no, I have just as good of evidence on Neal Stevens. Of course, it's all classified and I can't show it to anyone, but just trust me, I know he's a terrorist."

"Trust me" is not a basis for an imperial death sentence handed down without and due process.

Yes, for me. Citizens of the United States are granted certain constitutional rights, including the right to due process of law.

Supreme Court justice Scalia, usually one of the more conservative ones, even argued in 2004 that it was unconstitutional to even imprison a U.S. citizen accused of terrorism as an "enemy combatant" without a trial. I'm sure he'd be just as opposed to imposing a death sentence on one without a trial as well.



Careful...now you get into the rights of free speech, and does it pass the "imminent lawless action" test. It's not black and white.
out of curiosity - is the united states legally allowed to assassinate non-us citizens in countries, and of countries, that the us is not at war with?

are there defined limits to this?
__________________
"Enemy submarines are to be called U-Boats. The term submarine is to be reserved for Allied under water vessels. U-Boats are those dastardly villains who sink our ships, while submarines are those gallant and noble craft which sink theirs." Winston Churchill
joegrundman is offline   Reply With Quote