You prove my point, CCIP.
"A real man or woman is one who isn't preoccupied with who they are and what standard they ought to conform to, but one who lives productively according to whatever body and psyche they were given, rather than someone else's idea of it."
The natural state of man is an aggressor. We are the hunters, women are the gatherers. We are the "there is a problem, here is how we fix it", while women are "here is how I feel about the problem".
The fact that men are being pushed into behaviors and actions more becoming the female natural state is exacly why there is a correlation.
Just because a man chooses to do something "sensative" or whatnot on occasion does not make him less of a man. However, when certain societal forces (like fashion - for example) try to guide men into more feminine looks or behaviors, then its a slow attempt at sissification.
"Because more testosterone and macho is a great solution to all the world's problems, of course.
"
There is a huge difference between having testosterone and being macho. Its not that every guy should be a truck driving son of a gun - but the issue is that being a truck driving sone of a gun is now looked down upon. People are who they are by nature, yet while we are supposed to accept the boys and girls who want to wear clothing of the opposite gender, society sticks its nose up in the air at the "macho" guy who just is living his life his way. Truck driver (a fat bum), biker (troublemaker), country boy with a pickup (hick with a shotgun), etc. They are all thought of in a more negative light. Why? Because there is an undercurrent of desire to get rid of the rugged, take no bullcrap mindset that certain types of men exhibit.
As for possessing a set of gonads being a fix for all thats wrong in the world, no its not. But then again, most of the political problems of this world could be easily solved if the people in charge had some intestinal fortitude, so in many situations - it wouldn't hurt.