Quote:
Originally Posted by Gargamel
But there is little difference in infectious rates these days.
|
Absolutely not true. There's this:
http://www.science20.com/news_accoun..._behavior_data
Quote:
|
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.
|
This indicates a terrifying difference in rates of HIV infection in the homo community.
Plus you've obviously never heard of "bug-chasing".
http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...to_become.html
This is a mostly homo activity. Those of us who live in California know what this is and it's impact. Your need to appear "tolerant" simply isn't worth the risks to the blood supply if my family needs a transfusion. Homo's specifically need to be banned to cut risks. You're right, we can't eliminate all risks. But here is one risk that can be minimized.