The cause for this "war against terorism" is still umm let's say "debatable.
http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/35/35438/1.html
Sorry, in german - but i did not find the original. Thing is, the coordination of the attacks were impossible to stage for terrorists, the interceptors were guided in the wrong direction, the terrorists (?) exactly knew where the radar shadows were - very strange material
The holding pattern:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13723849/T...-Scrambles-129
Deleted tapes, scramble:
http://www.oredigger61.org/?p=2028
Exercises for hijacking the planes, NORAD:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16411947/N...Hijack-Summary
Anyone remembers the "Lone gunmen". Government lets passenger crash into the WTC, objective being a pretext for new wars with a massive and ongoing increase of defence funds:
Official 9/11 report.
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
Initiative to find out what happened:
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-10-0...ion-initiative
From Neal's link:
" ...
In the months afterward, the U.S. did what we're accustomed to doing after being assaulted.
We waged a war.
We invaded the country from which the attack had originated.
We took down the regime.
Two years later, we invaded another country and took down another regime, associating it (erroneously) with the terrorists who had struck us. ..."
Well ..
I wonder if politicians know what was really staged and happened, whether they were informed about what really happened, and whether at least Bush knew it we will never know.
Obama leads a more professional war against terrorist leaders than Bush with those drones, but with a lot of collateral and political damage.
Founded on a cause that is .. debatable.