Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin
No, need to apologize, I got your comment right. 
My definition was directed at mookie's post, as he seems to imply that Haaretz' choice of words would be judgemental.
When somebody attacks a bus of civilians, one would call the attacker a criminal, when they have an ideological background it is not a bias to call them terrorists.
My half-arsed attempt of a satire was directed at people who try to legitimate those attacks with the most absurd justifications. People who claim to support freedom but have no problems getting into bed with the fascists from Hamas. |
I didn't imply anything. I found it funny to highlight the difference in terms that Haaretz used vs AP's. It goes to show even the slightest difference in wording can alter someone's view of a story.