For those who disagree with Stiebler and think this is a matter of oppinion, i say read again what he wrote.
Those things can be approched with logic and if the outcome of a supposed realism fix is a highly unrealistic behaviour in game, it is as a matter of fact not realistc period.
His logic was crystal clear, i fail to see how can anyone who is claiming to have realism in mind denie the objectivity of this approach .
Further,especialy Rubini and Redwine read again what he wrote.
I have to stress,THose questions are not a matter of oppinion.
If you claim realism , make logical faults and then counter fix the new inroduced behaviour,the logic base you used is faulty.
I agree with Stiebler 100%.
|