View Single Post
Old 07-29-11, 06:12 AM   #15
razark
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danlisa View Post
Which brings me to another question, why did NASA decide to develop a 'free fall' re-entry craft. Surely (while costly on fuel) a powered decent minimises the requirement for a fixed re-entry angle and the frictional heat generated on the craft.
Using a powered decent system would increase the complexity, size, and weight of the vehicle. The weight is a major factor. Every bit of the spacecraft that comes down must have first been lifted to space. Why go to the effort of lifting a powered decent system if you can get away with not using one? You can use the weight saved for other payload of equipment.
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"
razark is offline   Reply With Quote