View Single Post
Old 07-14-11, 09:18 AM   #2
Penguin
Ocean Warrior
 
Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rheinische Republik
Posts: 3,322
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuer Frei! View Post
http://yarchive.net/gun/ammo/mercury_in_bullet.html

The theory or rather concept behind this is to increase its lethality by poisoning.
As the projectile impacts it expands and breaks up and deposits the mercury.
I'm assuming it gives it a slightly higher impact energy, since mercury is heavier than lead.
Certainly negligible though.
But then again wouldn't the mercury vaporize as it exited the barrel?
Interesting link, thanks. So I guess you have to somehow seal the parts of the bullets you don't want to "amalgan"
I didn't quote all of privateer's post, he mentioned that the bullets don't explode like in the movies.
The mercury would definitely vaporize alone by the air friction if it would not be coated. I am not sure however if a wax coating is sufficent to protect it. Sure, the (copper) casing will take most of the heat of the fired bullet, however the question is how hot the tip of the projectile gets.
Those guys (http://www.goinfrared.com/media/www_...org_bullet.pdf) measured the temperature of bullet, fired from an AR15, at 267° C (513°F), shortly after it left the barrel. This would melt wax, if the tip is this hot.

However in this article about gunshot wounds (http://liberalforum.org/liberalforum...unshot-wounds/) they state that bullets don't get hot enough to kill bacterias on it
Quote:
All gunshot wounds are contaminated with bacteria. On occasion one still hears the myth that bullets reach such a high temperature in the gun barrel that they are sterilized by being fired. This was proved false by LaGarde in 1892 [47] , whose findings were more recently verified by Thoresby and Darlow. [48]
This would contradict the theory that wax would melt.
We'll have to wait what privateer says, as he certainly tested this in practice
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote