I understand getting rid of troublesome units and such, but at what point will upkeep, upgrades and maintenance on the antiquated B-52s outweigh the cost of improving the B-1s, superior speed, stealth and weapons package (correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the B-1 carry a larger variety of weapons then the B-52?) design?
Anyways, I'm all for the saying of don't fix it if it's wrong (B-52), but really, is the U.S going to run this bomber for more then 40 years?
Anyways,
Just my thoughts,
Cheers
__________________
Quote:
|
The U.S almost went to war over some missles in Cuba... Thank god the X-Men were there to save us right?
|
|