View Single Post
Old 06-28-11, 12:10 AM   #3
Gerald
SUBSIM Newsman
 
Gerald's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Close to sea
Posts: 24,254
Downloads: 553
Uploads: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by vienna View Post
Sometimes the FDA does actually act on behalf of the patient and not the mega-pharma corps; earlier this year, the FDA declined to enforce exclusivity for a brand-name drug over pharmacy compounded, generic versions. The issue was price. When the drug, progestin, was compounded by a pharmacy, the cost to the patient was around $15.00 USD per injection. A pharma-corporation, KV, who did not ior patent the drug, bought exclusive rights to the brand-name version for $200 million USD. To recoup, they increased the price of the brand-name drug (Makena) to $1,500 USD per injection. The FDA then refused to enforce KV's exclusivity claims and allowed continued pharmacy-compounding of the drug. KV responded by lowering their price to a mere $590 USD per injection. AFIK, the non-enforcement of exclusivity continues. It should also be noted that the drug, progestin (or brand-name Makena) is a pregnancy assisting drug to treat pregnancy complications and the course of treatment would require many injections...

http://www.stltoday.com/business/loc...4ecd8c732.html

http://www.ipbrief.net/2011/06/01/a-...sivity-policy/

Sometime the actions of mega-pharm corps can be a bitter pill to swallow...
Interesting links that you have picked up,
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood.

Marie Curie





Gerald is offline   Reply With Quote