Well that is unfortunate. SWAT teams generally have the right to shoot anyone who is acting in a life threatening way such as pointing a firearm at anyone else. So if he had his AR-15 raised and pointing in the general direction of the SWAT team, or started to raise it, the shooting is legitimate even if the weapon had its safety on (or even if it proved not to be a real gun at all).
However there are a few concerns, first off is the number of hits on the victim. SWAT teams are trained to fire short controled bursts of 2-5 rounds, so either practically the entire team shot at him, or one or more officers were not in control of themselves. I have to doubt that the entire team had entered when the shooting started so I suspect the latter. According to the swat commander he though they fired 100 rounds.
I am also wondering if they followed proper procedure, and why they didn't use a flashbang on entry.
|