I dont know for sure if the one shot had a gun or not though his partner clearly did I dont see why both would not have been armed the way they came into the place.At any rate his split as soon as a weapon was drawn I personally think that the other young man should be held responsible for his pals death and that Ersland should get something as well for shooting the kid several times after he was clearly not a danger to him.
What is surprising to me is the fact that the kid that got shot and went down and was apparently not even moving and Ersland clearly turns his back twice and grabbed the other gun he seems very calm in that entire process at the same time people tend not to think clearly in highly stressful situation like this either and.Ersland bares some responsibility fro having shot the kid after he was no longer a danger to others.I dont think he should spend years in prison though he did show lack of control shooting the kid 5 or 6 more times after being put down.
three camera views:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=eed_1243733340