SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Ladofsubs · 05-07-11, 12:08 PM

The US military and NATO reject all the studies linking the use of Depleted Uranium weapons to increased rates in cancer and birth defects, in both our own troops and civilians living in war zones. Do you agree with the Military's claims?

Here's a video showing both sides:
http://www.youtube.com/user/3dbabes?.../0/F_xyoC9YfKE
http://www.youtube.com/user/3dbabes?.../0/TZwyh0ttxak

If Depleted Uranium is safe, then why did Kuwait ship 6,700 TONs of sand contaminated with Depleted Uranium by the US military, all the way across the world to be buried in Idaho in 2008?

Here is the news article:

tdn.com/business/local/article_0a5745e3-eae4-553f-89ff-daf7dd07b94c.html

Just curious, thanks.

05-07-11, 12:08 PM	#1
Ladofsubs Nub Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 3 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Depleted Uranium weapons. The US military and NATO reject all the studies linking the use of Depleted Uranium weapons to increased rates in cancer and birth defects, in both our own troops and civilians living in war zones. Do you agree with the Military's claims? Here's a video showing both sides: http://www.youtube.com/user/3dbabes?.../0/F_xyoC9YfKE http://www.youtube.com/user/3dbabes?.../0/TZwyh0ttxak If Depleted Uranium is safe, then why did Kuwait ship 6,700 TONs of sand contaminated with Depleted Uranium by the US military, all the way across the world to be buried in Idaho in 2008? Here is the news article: tdn.com/business/local/article_0a5745e3-eae4-553f-89ff-daf7dd07b94c.html Just curious, thanks.