Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
I also say that it is hilarious what debates are now being waged over the morality of killing Bin Laden and whether or not it is legitimate for a democracy to kill an enemy. Every Western government kills when the police hunts down a gangster and he starts to shoot at the police. But one of the worst gangster of the past two decade suddenly should represent the exception? Democracies have the right to kill their enemies in self-defence or prevention of these enemies committing such disastrous crimes like Al Quaeda did. It needs a truly decadent society to start a debate about the legality of this, really.
|
In this case barely, if you have two goals in front of you, you know that both do not hesitate to kill, they like it, who do you choose? Or would you go back, then you have two targets that are in your vicinity, therefore no soul defense situation, how would you act, plan and proceed with the slopes or you, for in both cases they are potent killers and do not care about you, you are only in their statistics, one in the crowd, of course, have to measure, but a debate like that in this case is ridiculous