Quote:
Originally Posted by razark
Of course, some people will never be convinced. There are people that seem to thrive off of disbelieving anything the government claims.
|
And othger püeople will always be convinced, no matter what. They thrive of belief even when not a single evidence is there and the one "evidence" having been given is a confirmed forgery and even meanwhilke has been withdrawn from publication, if I understand it correctly.
It was claimed by Pentagon employees that there is indeed photography that could serve as evidence for the events yesterday night. If it indeed is that, all speculations could bed ended immediately when releasing it. Just giving excuses for why it is not being released, just feeds speculations.
Believing on the basis of confirmed forgery and nothingness, is no virtue. Not even a sign of cleverness.
I'm the first to welcome the confirmation of BL's end. My fiorst posting in thios thread expressed cheers and congratuilations. The doubts I got when realising how thin the "evidence" given so far really is. Maybe it nevertheless is true. But it cold also be that it all is just a staged event to give Obama a boost in a time of national crisis. These doubts are legitimiate, and well-founded so far: no proof, just a forged photo, and claims - nothing else so far. It is not the same like doubting the landing on the moon.
If I have learned one thing in life, it is to never trust or respect politics and that politicians and ideologic leaders alike stop short of nothing if it serves their interest.
The excuses for a much bigger operation like the Vietnam war or the Iraq war, were staged. The excuse for the German attack on Poland, was staged. How much easier must it be to stage the "evidence" for a small and limited operation like two helicopters full of troops killing one person?