[DarkFish]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Its to fit in with culture, not to stand apart.

Well that's the point, kilts are part of Scottish culture so they should remain part of Scottish culture. Burqas are not part of Western culture so they should not be part of Western culture.

Thats better, so is there any good reason why your personal wants should set national policy or override other peoples wants?

And again you hit the nail on the head Is there any good reason why the personal wants of muslims should override the wants of Westerners?

Your arguement was that they could have a machine gun under the robe,get your position in order.

My argument was they could do both.
Meanwhile, did you notice yet the machine gun argument was just a support for my main argument? Which, by the way, you still haven't addressed.

Is there some special requirement that you personally have to feel you can trust every individual that walks through a city?

There are some special requirements that I personally have to feel I can not trust every individual that walks through a city. If someone wears stockings on his head, I don't trust him. If someone wears a nikab, I don't trust him/her either.

They most certainly did.

They most certainly didn't. I read through them and my argument wasn't even mentioned.

There is the problem. They are clamping down on the tourist and market exemptions which are unholy in their eyes. Though it was ruled that their local attempts on other legal isses were against the law, however their official policy in government is that Holland should have laws and punishments based on good old testament scripture...but on the bright side they have had to drop their objections to females being allowed to vote.

Don't get me wrong, I hate those guys as much as I hate fanatic muslims. Every religious loon is a religious loon, the only difference is which loon they worship.