[Skybird]

Why is it that even before having clicked any of the two links Krauter set up, I already knew by his few introducing words that this was something that was not about Buddhism, atheism, Judaism, Christianism, but Muhameddanism - again? Is it because Buddhist or Jewish migrats do not give us these kinds of troubles? Is it because Islam being noisy and always demanding more special status for itself is the total norm and rule, directly based on its scripture and its holy claim for a Muhammedanised world order? Is it because of all the many, continued bad experiences we have made with it over the past 40 years? And the 1000 years before those 40 years? Is it because in Europe we see migrants of non-Muslim faith and from noin-Muslim countries fitting into our societies quite well and withiout much friction, while migration from Muslim countries is a record of failure and integration failure and denial of wanting to integrate? Is it because non-Muslim migrants understand that as newcomers they adopt to our ways of living, while Muslim migrants so ver yoftenh demand that we need to adopt to theirs?

We have no problem with integration, but Muslim integration is what gives us troubles, time and time again. Therefore, we must not be against migration in general, but against Muslim migration.

Anyhow. One needs to not wanting to know what is going on in order to claim that one cannot see what is going on. For all who have eyes to see and ears to listen and a mind to think with, the obvious truth is presented unhidden, in all openess. If they refuse to make use of these three gifts, they also will not notice when the freedom to use them is being taken away from them. After all, the dog's greatest pleasure lies in obeying its master and laying at his feet - that's all freedom it ever desires. And who knows, it even may be a pleasant life.

If you are a dog.