Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike
Ironic, but alas -
My argument wasn't BASED upon that premise. It was based upon the premise that such a statement would IMPLY. Now, technically speaking, even if there are a miniscule amount of programs cut (which would make that statement wrong), how does that invalidate the premise that the government needs to examine and cut redundant programs?
|
Adding dubious inferences weakens an argument. Strive for accuracy and you'll make a stronger point.