By that, you mean you'll just ignore my points and the legitimate legal aspects of this case and continue to spout that atrocious rhetoric you call "points". You have posted 8 times in this thread, yet have presented no legal argument for your side and a counterargument against Judge Sumi, whereas I have taken the time and put forth the effort to do so for you in order to explain the legal background behind this case and how there are indeed issues to be had with how this bill was passed, both of which with regards to the OML (proving why it was, moreoever, illegal in the first place with regards to the notice).[/quote]I missed this before. Let me explain clearly why I'm not going to get into a all-out legal tit-for-tat with you.
The main reason is I don't think you really have a grasp on legalese to begin with. You're making these brash claims that all things illegal are crimes. They are not. Speeding, for instance, is not a crime.
In fact, in Wisconsin, 1st Offense Drunk Driving is not a crime (this has been a contentious, ongoing debate).
Another supporting reason is you clearly haven't bothered to get your facts straight. With the 2011 legislative session, both houses voted unanimously to adjourn the regular session and enter into a special one, early.
These are two basic concepts, both of which you've side-stepped through clear ignorance in order to invalidate my points. However, the fact remains that these two concepts are REAL ones, therefore side-stepping them only invalidates that which follows.
Here's a link to an excellent article explaining the latter portion clearly:
http://maciverinstitute.com/2011/03/...omises-appeal/