Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike
Yes it IS illegal.
There are plenty of things that are illegal but not criminal, and this is one of them. That's Lawyer 101. Perhaps you should brush up on the basics.
|
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-...11_AB%2011.pdf
No, it is not. You can only be discharged from your duties if you are a public worker and go on a strike (that is, fail to report to work for three days straight and/or show a clear dereliction in your job's tasks which have been presented to you). It is not a crime, and you cannot be sent to jail or prison or even be arrested for it... you do know what a crime is, don't you? I guess not.
To use an excerpt from your earlier post:
You're reminding me of a kid who's being told something he doesn't want to hear and just plugs his ears, screaming "BLAH BLAH BLAH". Are there any facts that you wish to contribute or are you more inclined to just assume everyone opposing your ideology just must be wrong?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aramike
Furthermore, you're cherry picking the open meetings law.
|
Do tell how. I merely explained how Judge Sumi was correct in citing this portion of the OML and was also correct in her verdict that the state senate had violated it by not providing adequate notice as they are required to... and that, furthermore, it does not qualify for an exemption. Nothing more or less.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aramike
I'll just be patient and let the upcoming rulings explain specifically why you're wrong, as you're clearly choosing to ignore other points on the books ... which I've already presented.
|
By that, you mean you'll just ignore my points and the legitimate legal aspects of this case and continue to spout that atrocious rhetoric you call "points". You have posted 8 times in this thread, yet have presented no legal argument for your side and a counterargument against Judge Sumi, whereas I have taken the time and put forth the effort to do so for you in order to explain the legal background behind this case and how there are indeed issues to be had with how this bill was passed, both of which with regards to the OML (proving why it was, moreoever, illegal in the first place with regards to the notice).
By all means, do so. I'll more than gladly oblige you in the coming weeks.