I think that this discussion is missing an important point: Not all the muslims are the same. You can't say that automatically all muslims do this or that just because the Iranian president said that nonesense, or because Al Qaeda commited the horrible terrorism acts they did. Even if the muslim doctrine (And I must remember here that there are several different interpretations of Quran) said this all, you should at least distinguish between those who follow it strictly and those who don't.
Come on guys, one of the most terrible errors one can commit is to put a large group of people in the same bag and label them independently of their daily behaviour.
The fact that the Iranian president is an as***ole doesn't mean that literally thousands of muslims who live among us here in Europe are potential terrorists.....
Be more reasonable. The first thing the radicals want you all to do is see an enemy in every muslim. That way they can recruit more terrorists, grown up by that hate. Do not follow that game!!
Neal Stevens wrote:
Quote:
|
I don't know, mate. This kind of thing could easily spiral into nuclear war. It would be a lot better if the civilized countries could stop wasting time and agree to impose limits on nuclear proliferation. This is dangerous ground.
|
If Vietnam and Korea wars did not trigger a nuclear war between US and USSR, this will not do. Unlike in that cold war era, China and US are mutually dependant and will not enter a direct conflict easily. And in any case, nuclear weapons are always last resource for the looser in case his homeland is theratened. But the US would never dare think about invading China. It would be impossibel to control that country....
I believe we are nowadays safer from the nuclear danger than ever since Hiroshima & Nagasaki
.