I've now finally read the whole thing (except for the conclusion as I was just not in the mood to give me more of this) and I've to say that this guy has a fair amount of good points but also does exactly the same stuff that he blames Stoklasa for. He too is catching straws to miscredit him at any point, he takes things literally where anyone with a brain would say: O.K. it's over the top but in line with the comical part of the review.
Besides less name calling would have made it a much better and less tiresome read IMHO.
Conclusion:
If you loved RLM's review then this might be a healthy read to set things into proportion.
However I didn't need RLM's review or the counter review to think that Episode One was one boring over - CGIed mess with little to no entertaining value. At least for me.
