Of course does the guy needs to be protected from being taken advantage of. The question is how? In terms of safer sex, it is also the responsibility of his partner.
But retards do sometimes have a sex drive which can bring themselves or others in danger, for this case, it is for example allowed here to give them something to "come down". If the sex is consensual, then it is legal here and no court may say otherwise.
I agree, that we need more infos about this case to make a judgement call, from the information given, I can only say that the only reasonable decision was that the man is allowed to have sex ed.
If I have a car crash when I drive home next hour and my brain gets damaged, those suckers should try to stop me having sex with my Frau!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Ignoring any moral implication I just remind of a simple fact: diseases and defects that are genetically transported, will progressively effect the racial gene pool. So when you medically treat persons with such defects and now they survive until the age when they can multiply where before they would have died and nature would have run natural selection that way, this has, over generations, an effect of the general gene pool.
The number of people with bad eyes who need to wear glasses, is increasing for example. While short sight is not necessarily something that would doom the individual to die in the "wilderness"  , it nevertheless illustrates how the presence of a genetic characteristic - bad eyes in this case - results in this characteristic spreading in the gene pool. That with too bad eyes you would die in the wilderness because you can no longer kill your prey or see where your field is, is minor in this example.
But the number of hemophiliac persons is increasing, too. This is because in modern times they have more often children carrying the genetic defect as well, where as in earlier times they simply died before they could have had children.
Just a reminder of biological facts, I do not make any moral judgment or moral comment here. Just want to remind you that nature is totally unsentimental and does not know man's ideas of morals and ethics. |
You may not wanted to imply any morale here, but you did.
The talk about the racial gene pool sounds like promoting eugenetics to me. Mankind has evolved from gatherer and hunter society, and even then, the old, weak or dumb were fed (if possible). If you couldn't hunt, then a paerson may contribute to the tribe in other ways.
Bad eyesight has more to do with the lifestyle we have today than with genetics.
The article also states that the guy is together with another man, so no chance of procreation here - the holy gene pool is safe.
If intelligence was solely a matter of genetics, ****ing mankind would have been gone for long.
