Quote:
Originally Posted by Gammelpreusse
Sorry, then we have completely opposite definitions of "family". For me, family is the natural byproduct of a relationship and consequent offspring, based on instinct and mutual bonding, support for each other being a result of that. For you it appears to be a state institution with a formal functionality within this state, only workable under special protection of the law. More or less a state approved concept bar any personal attitude involved.
|
This part and definition I do not touch upon. I just remind you that we - you are German, yes? - have the article 6 of the Basic Law, that puts children, families and mothers, all three of them get individually mentioned, under special protection of the state, saying that they deserve special caretaking of the whole community. And I explained why this is so: that it is becaseu children are the futrure economic and financial basis of the social community withiut whom the community cannot surevive and the old cannot been taken care of, and that therefore couples producing the children serve a vital, inevitable role for ther social community that is not matched by craviong for attention by singles, or gay couples.
There are simple, plain, economic as well as human motives that made the creators of the Grundgesetzut setting up thisd article 6. Emotions and romanticism have little to do with it. Sentiments and emtoions - are ypour poroivate business, not the states or the communities. And you are free to have empotional relations whatever you want, married or unmarried, heterosexual or homosexual. All this is of zero concern for the communial overall interest. It makes no difference whether I stay single, or become gay and have a partner. What makes the difference for the communal future wellbeing, is babies - or no babies.
Why do you guys make it so complicated - over confused sentiments only?