Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike
I support that attitude 100%. But how does that equate to society fiscally and legislatively supporting it?
Hell, do what you want ... just don't ask anyone to support you doing that which I find objectionable.
|
But what IS objectionable? All I that came out of this debate so far is personal preference on how people have to live their lives. I completly agree on the stance that nature certainly did not plan for living beings to be straight, kinda a contradiction to reproduction. However, homosexuals are homosexuals, they won't just simply change. All you do is making others lifes miserable with such stances with no win whatsoever for anybody but the satisfaction of straights keeping the upper hand. Believe me on the other hand, if homosexuals ever came into a position where they tried to force their lifestyle onto others I'd be as opposed to that as well.
In the US, the impression constantly comes over that people have an utter aversion for the government to meddle in the affair of families and how to raise up children. So why does the same not apply to people themselves as well?