[Skybird]

Since several millenia mankind uses to think in terms of mother and father and child and family. Noticable rules of far-reaching adoptation, like in Rome for example or with certain Indian tribes, do not change that. But suddenly a going-mad Western mankind thinks it must take it upon itself to abandon a social concept that has proven its worth and value both for survival and for the interest of society since so long just to "prove" that women no ölonger are discriminated by being asspoicated with the mother-role and that they act as successfully and equal in the business world like men? Because that is what is really behind it: the ideologic desire to abandone motherhood in order to free women for the claim by emancipation. You can find this, hedged and encoded, both the the official description of policy for the running legislation period of the German family ministry run by the womean with the always present battle-smile, Ursula von der Leyen, and you also find it in the declaration of interior political goals for social policies on EU level.

BTW, there have been several people crossing my ways who were raised by stepfathers or stepmothers, and nevertheless called them, felt for them as and referred to them as their father or mother. Becasue the terms describes not so much a statistical observation of how man children ar raised by the biological or just social parents, but in the first the terms describe how somebody refers to and feels for a given women and man playing a role in his/her life, and it refers to the emotional binding and the social role model and the communal importance of having children raised not by state-run collectives or interest groups refered to as "Anonymous Parents" or "Elter in Neutrality", but by families.

We see our Wetsern cultural structure desintegrating since longer time now. We endlessly relativsde ourselves. We are being out in question by new challengers in the race. The conditions of the envrionment in whichg we live, raise certain indices indicating the conditions of our future survival to critical levels. We are demanded to apologise endlessly and feel guilty for the crimes coimmited by our forefathers. We want to be nice and demosntrate how tolerant we are even if that means to deny our own identity. We have plenty of academic brnches, namely social "sciences", pedagogic "science", psychology, wanting to maintain the fincial fundings and individual careers - and so need to endlessly produce fictional ideas and pseudo-theories in order to found an explanation and reason why they even exist, and so they theorise away like mad - in Germany, we can sing a song of that, for example regarding our school system and the Kultusministerkonferenz. The latter is not only incompetent, disconnected from reality, and a total disater - it'S existence even gets explained by several law experts as non-constitutional (ex-chancellor Helmut Schmidt also says that).

So: when seeing it in this context, and in the context of an ideologic drive to make woman, whether they want or not, to serve in a new social role-model, no longer as "mother" but as "female males", then it all nevertheless is still self-damaging and insane - but in the insane context as outlined above the insane thing - in a perverse way - suddenly makes a lot of sense.