[DarkFish]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

I know perfectly well what you mean, and I know that it doesn't really make any sense.


Those two claims were so ludicrous it is self evident that they were complete nonsense.

I have provided evidence for my claims. The burden of evidence is now on you. Just saying my claims are false is not going to work.

A Dutch tradition that still existss in a few Dutch places.
So that would be a Dutch tradition as it is a Dutch tradition and its Dutch because its in the Netherlands and the people whose tradition it is are errrrr.....Dutch.

No you didn't, you demonstrated yourself having a mental block again.

Right.... and growing a beard is an American tradition because the Amish do so

Interesting link, did you notice the bit in there about Dutch culture.

I did. Did you?

As for your statisitics, they are meaningless, you made a claim about Turkish and Arabic women you see, so a statistic about all turkish women means nothing.

I made an observation, using that observation to form a claim about Turkish and Arabic women in general. So a statistic about Turkish women in general exactly matches with what my claim was about. In case you didn't notice, the statistics back up what I claim.

Seriously, this is the fallacy of all fallacies. Person D claims X and presents evidence for it. Now person T claims the evidence is false because it proofs that X is true

Besides which you need to explore the warped perception angle as the simple fact is you notice headscarfs more rather than see them more.

Indeed. Statistics show I see an astonishing 4% more headscarfs than there really are

So far I havn't had to as you dig yourself into a hole.

Burden of evidence, Tribesman, burden of evidence....

Sorry but you did, which is why it was a perfect example.
You made lots of claims about Turks doing things, added the qualification that of course not all Turks do those things but made the very foolish claim that Germans don't do those things

If you're under the impression that I made those claims you have misunderstood my claims as much as you can misunderstand them. Maybe I didn't write them down clearly enough so that your mind can grab its all too simple meaning, but I never meant to claim what you say I do.

Why do you have to lie? I said you appeared to know bugger all about the dutch laws at issue and you proved me correct by not even being able to understand the law or even identify the correct branch of laws even thogh your fathers summons and specific charge was on the link.

What do you mean "lie"? Did you not claim to be some kind of expert on Dutch law?
Also your memory appears to fail. Maybe you want to see a doctor? As I told you at the time, my dad was originally charged with something else than the link said.

Excuse me, you claimed a verdict of guilty was really a not guilty verdict.

And elephants are blue.

Well done.
Now see if you can understand how those figures are reached?
After all a reported suspect only means one thing

Yes I can. Apparently you can not.

But anyways, I've found another statistic which corrects for the size of the populations: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/FA26E...minaliteit.pdf (look at page 30-43)
Now the burden of evidence is even more on you than it already was.

Not at all, if anything I would have expected them to be higher, as I said above, they only mean one thing.

They mean exactly one thing that you have proven unable to understand.

Sorry, your claim was that Germans don't do that sort of thing.
See what I mean about digging yourself into a hole.

As I have said a few quote-blocks above, I didn't claim that. Now where's that hole you speak of?

It certainly did, all you had to do was look and think but you simply wouldn't as to do so would have demolished your own claims.

Maybe I did look and think and the result of that backed up my claims. But the possibility of that escapes your small mind.

Do you even realise what you had written and what it related to that you had previously written?

I do. Now do you realize what you had previously written?



Tribesman, I've provided more than enough evidence for my claims. The burden of evidence is now on you. Either provide some evidence, or I can't see why I'm still having this discussion.