Quote:
Originally Posted by MaddogK
Yes, I read that, but it was superceded by
...and thats what I was replying to.
|
Meaning that if he hadn't given his oath, I would have agreed with him.
He has broken his oath and he should be punished for that. It doesn't mean he should be tortured though (yes, he is being tortured as Skybird points out).
Most of you attack Assange as well, who has no such oath, not even any allegiance with your country. Many of you think he should be punished as well. Why is that, if he hasn't sworn any oath? If you still think Assange should be punished that would make your oath argument bogus as it would apparently not be any argument in your very own eyes...