Quote:
Originally Posted by Growler
Whoa, easy, DF. I'm one of those "you all" to whom you're referring, and last time I checked, I hadn't shoved an oar into this conversation stating any of the above statements you're attributing to me.
|
I'm talking about the general US guy I see posting here. There are individuals to whom my statements do indeed not apply. There'll always be.
I also don't know if what I think is indeed true, but it definitely does seem so to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaddogK
Firstly- as a volunteer in the U.S. armed forces he should have understood he was no longer a citizen, but property of the U.S government. He gave up his freedom to act as an individual when he signed the contract to be part of the 'team' called the military, and again when he signed the confidentiality agreement when he applied for a security clearance.
I'm not defending the actions of our government, but you mistakenly think it's OK to NOT do what you promised to do because you don't agree with it.
How is this any different than the doctor who was recently courtmartialed because he refused to deploy, because he didn't agree that the president wasn't legally elected ?
This Manning fellow shared classified material with a foreign national because he felt it was his duty to NOT do his duty. He might as well shared plans for our nuclear missles because he feels it's wrong to be able to kill on such a large scale.
|
Didn't you read what I wrote or what? Read this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish
Yes, he did fail his duty as a soldier.
|