Wah, thread failure.
Regarding our favourite creepy-looking Australian (seriously, love him or hate him, the man looks
odd), I'm not surprised he didn't make bail. The judge, to his credit, has requested to view the Swedish evidence, and has maintained that these proceedings have nothing to do with Wikileaks.
They might be in existence due to the activities of Wikileaks, but the to-and-fro of the courts should be based on solely the evidence and appropriate extradition laws.
Speaking of the charges, this piece in the
Mail really got me curious, it's well worth a read.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz17PsSFVeE
Quote:
As for Assange, he remains in *hiding in Britain, and his website continues to release classified American documents that are *daily embarrassing the U.S. government.
Clearly, he is responsible for an avalanche of political leaks. Whether he is also guilty of sexual offences remains to be seen.
But the more one learns about the case, the more one feels that, unlike the bell in Enkoping, the allegations simply don’t ring true
|
Although if you're like me you'll want to prepare for the "******* me, I've just given the Mail my attention" feeling
