Indeed.
Can you show how in any way the judge didn't follow the law?
Can you show how the attempted lame excuse of a defence was in any way even remotely believable or applicable?
Face it he can only have really had one possible line of defence, and that line was simply untrue no matter how much leeway and stretch was given to the facts of the matter.
It is an interesting demonstration though on how some can reverse their usual complaints on certain issues.