So he checked on the laws to make sure he followed them, then was found to be in violation of the laws as he had checked on but not followed.
If local government(big government as you put it) wants mandatory sentencing then people shall expect mandatory terms.
To complain about getting caught after checking the laws makes this individual a real numbskull.
So to summarise he was moving from one place to another but hadn't got a get out that he needed, his defence was that he should be exempt as he was claiming he was really moving from a third place instead of between the two places he did...which is moot anyway as he hadn't sorted the move between the two let alone the claimed third move.
So he was attempting a pure bull excuse.
Besides which even if he had got the gun move sorted he was still transporting illegal ammunition and accesories which as he claimed to have checked the laws he must have known were illegal.
Quote:
|
Not only that, but it is no longer a crime to use another person's social security number
|
It is a crime, but you will not get a conviction that stands if you prosecute under the wrong laws.