SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Missing Name · 12-02-10, 12:55 AM

I think it might have made a significant difference, but still wouldn't be the whole solution.

Similarly, the Japanese had high underwater maneuverability subs in the works, the I-201 class. There are obvious design differences between the XXI and the 201, however. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-201_class_submarine

12-02-10, 12:55 AM	#4
Missing Name Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Westun New Yahk Posts: 748 Downloads: 131 Uploads: 0	I think it might have made a significant difference, but still wouldn't be the whole solution. Similarly, the Japanese had high underwater maneuverability subs in the works, the I-201 class. There are obvious design differences between the XXI and the 201, however. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-201_class_submarine __________________ Largest target sunk with deck gun: Japanese auxiliary cruiser, 15000 tons Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive. Read Brag's stuff