SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post - McDonald’s Workers Are Told Whom to Vote for

CaptainHaplo · 11-03-10, 05:11 PM

So one McDonalds Manager is to be roasted for this... but I guess the executives at Harrahs casino in nevada, and the staff for Harry Reid get a pass on this?

http://www.nationalreview.com/battle...elizabeth-crum

The quote to:
The Reid staffer suggests that Harrah’s execs “put a headlock on your supervisors to get them to follow through.” is in fact a suggestion to use PHYSICAL COERCION.

But funny - no one wants to discuss this little tidbit do they? You don't hear a blip on it - but how many of you subsimmers think that the one McDonalds employs more than Harrahs in Nevada?

Edit - as for the pamphlet being illegal - the law says no political material may be "attached" to their paycheck. Unless the manager stapled the pamphlet to their check, or he required some level of proof that the employee had voted as he wanted to recieve their paycheck, there was no "attachment" involved, and thus no violation of law. What is it when you suggest someone physically assault someone to get them to do what you want though? If it is actually done its definitely a violation of law....

11-03-10, 05:11 PM	#8
CaptainHaplo Silent Hunter Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 4,405 Downloads: 31 Uploads: 0	So one McDonalds Manager is to be roasted for this... but I guess the executives at Harrahs casino in nevada, and the staff for Harry Reid get a pass on this? http://www.nationalreview.com/battle...elizabeth-crum The quote to: The Reid staffer suggests that Harrah’s execs “put a headlock on your supervisors to get them to follow through.” is in fact a suggestion to use PHYSICAL COERCION. But funny - no one wants to discuss this little tidbit do they? You don't hear a blip on it - but how many of you subsimmers think that the one McDonalds employs more than Harrahs in Nevada? Edit - as for the pamphlet being illegal - the law says no political material may be "attached" to their paycheck. Unless the manager stapled the pamphlet to their check, or he required some level of proof that the employee had voted as he wanted to recieve their paycheck, there was no "attachment" involved, and thus no violation of law. What is it when you suggest someone physically assault someone to get them to do what you want though? If it is actually done its definitely a violation of law.... __________________ Good Hunting! Captain Haplo