Quote:
Originally Posted by Diopos
Tater,
the "threat" is not if the employees don't vote for the "chosen ones". The threat is about the "chosen ones" not getting elected. The "management" does not have to track individual employee vote (which is impossible) but merely the results of the election. And in this context it not only "promotes" what an employ should vote but it also suggests, indirectly, a more active role in the campaign (not only "your" vote but your friend's, too).
|
The end result is the same. The big-spenders in power will result in a bad business environment (except for a business that sucks at the government teat). So it behoves those people to try and avoid that, or they too will be at risk job wise.
It's merely a statement of reality and would have happened if the boss had not sent the letter. Sending it was a nice heads up to the employees, frankly (maybe they're still waiting for Obama to pay their bills?).