Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl
Mookie is absolutely right. Doubly so when one considers that this was a Rand Paul rally and the ideals he stands for.
Yeah, the fact that a liberal tried to infiltrate the rally and pull some horse**** stunt is pretty annoying. Yeah, there are many of us who are quite fed up with the liberal agenda, and how insidious it is. Yeah, the lady who tried to sabatoge the rally was a total bitch.
Even so, the act of restraining and hurting her is completely inexcusable, thrice so when the people performing the act are supposedly supporters of a libertarian agenda.
Why not let her make a fool of herself? Why not let her demonstrate to the public that her view is what it really is? Having a wigged, phony sign-bearer is pure political captial, and yet a few members of the Paul rally chose to attack her, instead.
The fact of the matter is that these people are really pissed off, even to the point of forsaking their own ideals. I sincerely doubt that they put the thought I've put into this post before they decided to step on that woman's head. Or shoulder. Or whatever. It doesn't matter. The use of force or coercion against another person who has not forced or coerced anyone is never acceptable.
|
Again, they felt Paul was in possible danger and took her down, completely justified.Using his foot to hold her down or "stomp" as some have mislabled it, prob shouldnt have done that but she wasnt harmed, she is okay.
Find the unedited video online(hard to) but I saw it on CNN earlier as well as Fox, it shows where she shoved her sign into front passenger window Paul's vehicle as he arrived then kept trying to get close once he emerged.Apparently Paul didnt have any real security which he should, so supporters of his took action as they should.What if she had been another "Squeaky From"(the woman who tried to shoot Gerald Ford) she could have taken out Paul.So taking her down was justified, the foot hold was justified but not the best course of action, although as mentioned, justified.