View Single Post
Old 10-24-10, 11:06 AM   #6
fitzcarraldo
Argentinian Skipper
 
fitzcarraldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere between Buenos Aires and the Bungo Suido
Posts: 5,320
Downloads: 3346
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwieger View Post
So which do you think is better?
If you want a subsim with realistic approach, immersivity and great mods, SH3 (with GWX), is the best subsim ever.

If you like a more "Hollywood" approach, and you think in yourself as Cary Grant in "Tokyo Destiny" or "Operation petticoat" (without the women), the SH4 PTO is your sim. SH4 is a very good sim (with mods - TMO- RFB- RSRDC), and I play it, but SH3 GWX is...better.

For SH4 - ATO Operation Monsun - good mod, but with some bugs - SH3 is more immersive and realistic.

And for times of charge: My SH3 with all the mods, I obtain 30-35 FPS; with SH4 TMO RSRDC, 60 FPS sinchronized...

I think and think about the realistics environments of SH3 and SH4. Is SH4 more realistic? Uhmmm...The atmosfere is more realistic than SH3, but the waves in SH4 TMO arenīt realistic at all. And the ports and bases are poor in comparission with that in SH3 GWX (and more in LSH3V5).

And - over all - is the "magic feeling" of play SH3 - more an adventure than the professional navy career of SH4).

Regarding SH5: comic heroes, FPS drops drops, only a sub, poor immersivity...I bought SH5, installed, played a campaign and uninistalled. Quickly return to SH3 (I love this game...).

Regards.

Fitzcarraldo
__________________



My subject is War, and the pity of War. The Poetry is in the pity - Wilfred Owen.
fitzcarraldo is offline   Reply With Quote