Once people are here in the US, they have freedoms ("Natural Rights") they would not have elsewhere in the West. I'll defend their broad 1st Amendment Rights as I defend my broad 2d Amendment Rights, etc. I cannot do otherwise and claim to care about what the US is all about.
Immigration certainly is a tool we can—and should—use to shape the country, however. To use the "melting pot" analogy, we're making our, um, fondue, and we should pick what cheese we want to add. Someone at the pot-luck might well have dropped some limburger into the pot—a tiny amount—and we cannot get rid of that, it's melted in. We can stop dropping any more in though, and maybe keep away from adding other things that won't add to the mix, at least not in large enough quantities to spoil the meal.
This, combined with an incredibly strict separation of church and State (ie: a strict reading of the 1st Amendment), along with an equally strict reading of the rest of the 1st (Freedom of Speech) is enough to deal with the rest, frankly. (the Wilders trial is exactly what we should avoid—it's a measure of the lack of freedom there that he could even be brought to trial for exercising political speech (boggles this American mind). Should he lose—disagree with him or not—it's an indication that freedom of expression is an illusion in places most people had assumed were incredibly liberal ("liberal" in the classical sense, not the partisan sense).
|