View Single Post
Old 10-16-10, 12:06 AM   #3
Aramike
Ocean Warrior

Best of SUBSIM
Chairman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,207
Downloads: 59
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
Yet we have had no nuclear weapon accidents which have lead to large loss of life. Civilian nuclear is a different story, in one case.

Nuclear weapons have, whether liked or not, kept the world from major existential conflicts since 1945. So the risk is certainly worth the cost at this point.

Casualties of the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815), 371,000 killed in action

World War I, military were 16 million military deaths

WWII, 22,576,700 to 24,491,800 military casualities.
I think you're arguing the wrong thing. I doubt that he's proposing that nuclear weapons are unneccesary. Rather, I suspect that the idea is that proper care has not always been taken regarding such weapons. I can hardly blame anyone for being concerned that our nuclear stockpile is at risk.

On another note, will your book be in stores?
Aramike is offline   Reply With Quote