Originally Posted by Magnum
I used a ruler on the monitor to see how wrong I was. Yeah, your right... is a difference, G should be a little bit at left, where is the second 0 from 0.0. In that case, P2 should be where is the top edge of M from KM on the "b" line. True, is a huge difference in the direction of the target, but even so, is not the real course. And going further, the readings from A2 will still hit around S4 and gives me a bigger distance than in reality. --- i ,allready answered why you got wrong solution. the bearings a ,b, and c are very critical and if not accurate then (with combination of bad drawing) give wrong result. the S4 will not be there if you had made correct the drawings (i am assuming here that bearings a,b and c are accurate) becuase the P4 would NOT be at the position you have it now.all would be different if you have made correct drawing.
My suggestion is to use, at the start, the bearing lines .make a mod that is vanishing the ship's images on navmap when you have contacts update on. that way ,when you have the contacts update on,you will have the bearing lines BUT NOT the ship's images.
ONCE you learn to do the procedure perfect (drawings must be done at higher zoom level ) then the next step will be to turn off the bearing lines BUT HAVE IN MIND THAT WHEN YOU SWITCH OFF THE BEARING LINES YOU ARE 'ENTERING' TO A WHOLE NEW PART OF HYDROPHONE HUNTING and that is becuase of the fact that bearing lines will not be EXACTLY the real ones and this may(depending from the angle between yours and target's course) have a GREAT impact at the final solution.
To understand the ''problem''... when target is 'coming' ON you with a very small angle it will take an 'age' to have a change of ,for example, 2 degrees at bearings.a difference that your ear may not be able to 'catch' so you will have to wait more. then you will have to wait exactly one ''age'' to take the next bearing but this may be a big failure becuase target will ''pass'' and moved away (and never get it again if its a fast target).
so,what do you do ?
a workaround is to NOT start the procedure of the method when you ,firstly ,got the contact. i don't know how real captains doing it but i am almost sure that captain was ''sticked'' to sonarman ...'watching' together the BEHAVIOUR of sonar bearings .the captain is manuevering the boat ,changing always SPEED AND COURSES (thats why i strongly suggest to learn the method with the moving u-boat) until they got a somewhat FAST changings at sonar bearings (this will make you to use smaller time intervals once its time to start the method's procedure) .not an easy task,experience is your 'friend' here and need some luck too . wrong decisions at courses or speeds and target will be lost but i bet that this was happening in reality back then too.
when we got FAST changings at sonar bearings,we start the method's procedure (not before).
IF you want to use the method with the stopped u-boat ...the workaround (at the situation that you are stopped and the target is 'coming' on you with a small angle) is to NOT USE EQUAL TIME INTERVALS but this demands to firstly know to do PERFECT the method with the equal time intervals . the not equal time intervals is the next step (i will do a video at future with not equal time intervals...it is on my todo list ).
Now I still don't understand exactly few things here. P1 is a really random location along line "a"?---yes ,absolutely random How far should be A2?---the goal is the angle between your theoritical fourth bearing and the final fourth bearing to become as large as possible(---the ideal is to become 90 degrees) Is there a precise time interval for bearing readings and a precise distance to travel between A1 and A2?---no to both.for time intervals...a rule that is NOT general is the time to have ,for example, 4-5 degrees bearing change from b1 to b2And about the precision of these readings... in this case I had a convoy and is impossible to say that the bearing is exactly 46 and not 44 or , not to mention that the sound level was very low. I could cheat by asking the sonarman/computer, but then what the point in realistic play?---read the above ...learn first to do it PERFECT with the bearing lines on map and then try to get it harder! Also, the sonar panel is broken, those vu meters are not working.. but let's say I have a broken sonar in reality. And I play with map contacts off, so my map is clear and I'm completely blind.
Your video is not helping me because I always stop the sub when I search for contacts.---you don't understand me. i told you to watch ONLY the part of the finding the first point of ''red line''.you can follow the same procedure, with the stopped u-boat ,in order to find the point P4 I know that the sea is not static, but these high level of physics are not implemented in the game, so is no point in keep the sub moving ---you will reconsider once you learn to do them both...you will see...and also do extra math to calculate the currents and my real speed.---there is no need for this (your speed).method is not effected by your speed
And regarding the tools... what I need most is a 2 ring & rotating compass so I don't need to position my ship at N or W every time I search for contacts.---why to do this ? there is no need ,you can draw the bearings at whatever direction your boat may beAlso a more exact ruler that I can also rotate. For example, to read the right values for where I should mark G between A1 and P1.I could do it as I did it now, by measure it on the monitor, but is kinda hard to keep the same zoom level all the time.---see the video at the part i told you ! you can avoid this... You guys have these tools in SH3-4, for SH5 is available only in TDW UI. As I said, right now I do all my maths on paper then I try to copy it on the navmap.. that's why most of the time I got wrong results. In booth cases, I miss the right tools.---you,allready have all the tools you need,see the video at the spoken part.maybe,you ''miss'' [-don't know becuase sh5 is deleted from my HD-]the big compass rose that is attached to you sub but again you can make the bearing drawings by using your protractor.also,use the circle tool when you want to make parallel lines (see the video )Tbh.. I would love to have such a table as it is in the game.. with a huge map and a lot of tools .. that would kill the boredom of this endless sink-refit gamestyle :P
Anyway, my biggest issue so far is the target speed. I'm using the 3.15 method and most of the time I can calculate the right speed, but not in the combat after I hit a target and the ship(s) speed change. That is the point when I go completely blind and I just estimate the speed according to what the game use so far.. 6-7 knts for evading merchant ships.---when target is changing speed or course you have no method for finding course or speed (they are changing !!). at sh3 i use the aob rings when i want to make a very fast shots (as in this case ) without map ploting ,with a constant speed measuring (fixed-wired method) and always a salvo shooting when target is changing course and speed (although the targets are 'idiots' ...i mean that they don't change course ,at least at sh3...they zig-zaging at the SAME course---i hope that devs have fixed ,at least this, in sh5) This is when I miss a lot. Wonder how those guys at that time made the maths when they conducted their attacks inside a moving convoy ... at night.
|