Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man
Sorry if I confused. If you cannot observe the action directly the theory has no value. Einstien, and all real science depends on this. That which cannot be directly observed is not science,
Whithout direct observation science fails. Thus atheism fails unless it is itsself a religion.
|
Atheism is a lack of faith in gods, it makes no positive claims, religions on the other hand does make positive claims without presenting positive evidence. Even if the theory of evolution was to be falcified it would not make creationism in any form any more true.
Also equating the theories of abiogenesis and evolution with atheism is a non sequitur.