Quote:
Originally Posted by tater
Everything at the UN is non-binding (or effectively non-binding since the only way to enforce is to threaten). They are useless. So "binding" is meaningless. If we ever signed a binding agreement, who would enforce it?
|
Unfortunately, with the EU and it'S damn charta of human rights it is different. Individuals and states could become the target of sanctions and punishement for real. And that national states have to turn the charta'S demands into binding national laws, is mandatory, with no option of parliaments objecting to parts of it. Doing so would trigger even more sanctionising - so EU laws and EU treaties say.
The EU of the past 15-20 years , the way it reoriented itself since the cold war ended, beside the arrival of Islam in Europe is the biggest cultural disaster in Europe since WWII, and is one of the biggest cultural disasters in all European history alltogether. We overcame the inquisition and the medieval, we overcame the 30-years-war and the churches' tyranny, we overcame facism and stalinism and ultranationalism, but if we will overcome the consequences of the EU and Islam, I have my doubts. The rubble of the world wars was easy to just move away, clean it up, and then rebuild new over it. But the impact of the EU does a kind of damage that is not so easy to compensate and repair. I fear it is changing Europe for the worse for many centuries to come. It seems to rip the hearts out of people's chest, and circumcise them right between their ears, right where the brain is.
And many people even applaude this. This is when I sometimes loose all hope and courage and good will and in weak moments think I should enjoy to watch it all going to hell.